• Home
  • Company
  • Clients
  • Services
    • Pre-Development
    • Development
    • Post-Development
  • Portfolio
    • Builders
    • Developers
    • Public Agencies
    • HOAs and Property Managers
    • Equity Groups
    • Law Firms
  • Resources
    • Bidding Opportunities
    • Blogs
    • Webinars
    • Company News
  • Careers
  • Contact

What do Level III Fees Mean for the Construction Industry?

Posted on 9 years ago
1 Comment
Blogs

On May 25th 2016, The California State Allocation Board (“SAB”) made findings that would allow school districts to levy Level III Alternative School Fees (“Level III Fees”), no longer approving apportionment for new construction.

So what does this mean exactly?

Let’s step back a bit.

With the adoption of Senate Bill 50 and Proposition 1A in 1998, California school districts that meet certain requirements are given an option of adopting alternative school impact fees known as Level II and Level III.

Level II:

  • Applies when the SAB is apportioning state school facility funding to school districts
  • Represents fifty percent (50%) of a school district’s school facility construction costs per new home served

In essence, when a developer is paying their school impact fees, that payment represents 50% of the true total while the other 50% is accounted for with funding from the SAB.

Level III:

  • Applies when the SAB officially declares that it is no longer making apportionments of state school facility funding school districts
  • Represents one-hundred percent (100%) of a school district’s school facility construction costs per new home served

In other words, the impact fee that a developer is responsible for, would represent 100% of the fee obligation without SAB apportionments/contribution.

So what now?

CBIA (California Building Industry Association) was successful in obtaining a Court Order preventing SAB from implementing level 3 fees and from sending a notice to the Legislature that State funds for new school construction are not available.

A preliminary injunction hearing on July 1 has been scheduled, to determine whether to extend the court order until a full hearing.

The Murow Development Consultants Team will continue to monitor the progress of this issue and similar reports to keep you up to date with the development industry.

Contributed by, Christian Gagne
Director of Reimbursements and Agreements

Previous Post
Master Planned Communities: 3 Ways to Build an Experience
Next Post
Murow Development Consultants attends BIA PASS Event at Strawberry Farms Golf Club

1 Comment. Leave new

  • Tim Markel
    May 31, 2016 11:25 pm

    Nice post Gagne!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

From The Blog

The Importance of a Proper Bid for a Successful Reimbursement

September 24, 2024

LADWP Fair Share Program: A New Approach to Line Extensions and Cost Sharing

August 26, 2024

LADWP’s Project Powerhouse: Affordable Housing and How It Affects You

August 26, 2024

Unlocking Savings: Streamlining Development with Fee Reductions

August 13, 2024

Slope Failure Remediation: The Role of Value Engineering and Construction Management Oversight

July 18, 2024

Effortlessly Navigate Riverside County’s Complex Closeout Process

June 17, 2024

Archives

Navigation

  • Home
  • Company
  • Clients
  • Services
  • Portfolio
  • Resources
  • Careers
  • Contact

Contact Us

16800 Aston Street, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92606

(949) 988-3270

[email protected]

Facebook
YouTube
Instagram
LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign-up for our monthly newsletter to learn more about industry news, access to useful resources, company updates, and receive other information.

Copyright © 2022 Murow Development Consultants. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy